Republican vice-presidential nominee J.D. Vance recently took aim at Apple, claiming the company benefits from Chinese slave labor. His comments, made during an appearance on CNBC’s Squawk Box, highlight how far politicians will go to score points during an election cycle — even if the claims are easily debunked.
Vance suggested that while Apple is not an "evil company," it benefits from slave labor in China. Yet, his accusation lacks any factual basis. Apple, under its Supplier Code of Conduct, prohibits forced labor and has demonstrated its commitment to human rights through investigations and third-party audits of its suppliers. For instance, when allegations of slave labor were made against O-Film Technology in 2020, Apple quickly intervened, ultimately finding no wrongdoing.
Rather than researching these efforts, Vance’s remarks seem rooted in social media rumors. His failure to verify his claims reflects poorly on someone vying for public office.
Misguided Comments on Wages and Tariffs
Vance didn’t stop at forced labor claims. He also called for higher tariffs and suggested that U.S. companies, like Apple, aren’t paying workers fair wages. However, Apple raised its starting wage for retail employees to $22 an hour back in 2022, well above the federal minimum wage of $7.25.
When discussing tariffs, Vance’s rhetoric mirrors that of former President Donald Trump, proposing import taxes of up to 100% on goods made in China. But history shows these tariffs rarely hit their intended targets. Instead of Chinese manufacturers absorbing the cost, U.S. companies and consumers often end up footing the bill through price hikes.
Election Rhetoric or Political Theatre?
As the election season intensifies, exaggerated claims are expected. Vance’s misguided attack on Apple is just one of many political talking points designed to rile up voters. However, a quick fact-check shows that American elections deserve more substance and less sensationalism.